Interstitial lung disease independently associated with higher risk for COVID-19 severity and mortality: A meta-analysis of adjusted effect estimates.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to address the association between interstitial lung disease and the risk for severity and mortality among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: The electronic databases of PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE were systematically searched. The pooled effect size with 95 % confidence interval (CI) was computed by a random-effects meta-analysis model. Heterogeneity test, sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, meta-regression analysis, Begg's test and Egger's test were performed. RESULTS: A total of sixteen eligible studies with 217,260 COVID-19 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The findings based on adjusted effect estimates indicated that pre-existing interstitial lung disease was significantly associated with higher risk for COVID-19 severity (pooled effect = 1.34 [95 % CI: 1.16-1.55]) and mortality (pooled effect = 1.26 [95 % CI: 1.09-1.46]). Consistent results were observed in the subgroup analysis stratified by sample size, age, the percentage of male patients, study design, setting, the methods for adjustment and the factors for adjustment. The results of meta-regression demonstrated that sample size, age and region might be the potential sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis exhibited that our results were stable and robust. No publication bias was observed in Egger's test and Begg's test. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis on the basis of adjusted effect estimates demonstrated that pre-existing interstitial lung disease was independently associated with significantly higher risk for COVID-19 severity and mortality.

Significant association between anemia and higher risk for COVID-19 mortality: A meta-analysis of adjusted effect estimates.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether there was a significant relationship between anemia and the risk for mortality among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients by a quantitative meta-analysis based on the adjusted effect estimates. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in electronic databases to identify all published literature. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to estimate the pooled effect size and 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity test, Begg's test, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-three articles with 573,928 COVID-19 patients were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. There was a significant association between anemia and an elevated risk of COVID-19 mortality (pooled effect size = 1.47, 95% CI [1.30-1.67]). We observed this significant association in the further subgroup analyses by age, proportion of males, sample size, study design, region and setting. Sensitivity analysis exhibited that our results were reliable. Begg's test showed that there was no publication bias. Meta-regression indicated that the tested variables might not be the source of heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis based on risk factors-adjusted effect estimates indicated that anemia was independently associated with a significantly elevated risk for mortality among COVID-19 patients.

Peripheral artery disease independently associated with significantly higher risk for COVID-19 mortality: Evidence based on adjusted effect estimates.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) on the risk of mortality among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients based on adjusted effect estimates. METHODS: Systematic searches were performed through electronic databases. A random-effect model was applied to calculate the pooled effect and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Inconsistency index (I2) was used to evaluate the heterogeneity across studies. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and Begg's test were all implemented. RESULTS: On the basis of 16 eligible studies with 142,832 COVID-19 patients, the meta-analysis showed that PAD significantly increased the risk for mortality among COVID-19 patients (pooled effect = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.10-1.51). The significant association was also observed in the subgroup analysis stratified by hospitalized patients, mean age ≥ 60 years, Europe and North America. Sensitivity analysis verified the robustness of our findings. Begg's test (P = 0.15) showed there was no potential publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 patients with PAD may have a greater risk of mortality. Clinicians and nursing staff are supposed to identify and monitor these high-risk patients in a timely manner and provide appropriate clinical treatment for them.